Virgin at Prayer

I wonder if people seeing new paintings at the dawn of each new period experienced them the way we experience an exciting new technology?

When the renaissance painters rediscovered perspective did their fans experience it the way we experience 3D movies? Was the incredible depth of emotion in Baroque anything like technicolor was for us? Or THX?

When I ran into Sassoferrato’s Virgin at Prayer at the National Gallery in London it was like running into a time machine and I didn’t know if I was going forward or backwards. I knew immediately that, as soon I got back to my own time period, I would have to finger-paint it on my iPad.


It took me a couple of months longer than I expected and I my missed my self-imposed deadline to be done in time to send it as a Christmas gift – but I got there in the end.

Epilogue: I just found this post in my drafts folder. Dunno why I didn’t post it before. I thought I had.

I finished the painting about 3 months ago but, sadly, haven’t painted anything since. I have a half-finished Edward Hopper rip-off in the works but my muse has left me stranded and who knows when she’ll be back. Time for a new hobby?

Published by

Ragged Clown

Based in San Jose, California

7 thoughts on “Virgin at Prayer”

  1. To answer your question though, I don’t think paintings were considered artistic pieces to be looked at in wonder until after the advent of photographs. It’s not like they were put in galleries or anything, they were just sitting in people’s houses, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *