Dignity Is a Useless Concept

In which Steven Pinker defends the notion that

“Dignity Is a Useless Concept.” Macklin argued that bioethics has done just fine with the principle of personal autonomy–the idea that, because all humans have the same minimum capacity to suffer, prosper, reason, and choose, no human has the right to impinge on the life, body, or freedom of another. This is why informed consent serves as the bedrock of ethical research and practice, and it clearly rules out the kinds of abuses that led to the birth of bioethics in the first place, such as Mengele’s sadistic pseudoexperiments in Nazi Germany and the withholding of treatment to indigent black patients in the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study. Once you recognize the principle of autonomy, Macklin argued, “dignity” adds nothing.

in a critique of President Bush’s council on Bioethics headed up by the man who said

There is a “mortal danger, that a person has a right over his body, a right that allows him to do whatever he wants to do with it.”

and offers up quotable gems such as

A free society disempowers the state from enforcing a conception of dignity on its citizens

and

In fact, every one of us voluntarily and repeatedly relinquishes dignity for other goods in life. Getting out of a small car is undignified. Having sex is undignified. Doffing your belt and spread- eagling to allow a security guard to slide a wand up your crotch is undignified. Most pointedly, modern medicine is a gantlet of indignities. Most readers of this article have undergone a pelvic or rectal examination, and many have had the pleasure of a colonoscopy as well. We repeatedly vote with our feet (and other body parts) that dignity is a trivial value, well worth trading off for life, health, and safety.

It’s long, but worth the read.

Published by

Ragged Clown

Based in San Jose, California

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *