<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Posts and Categories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s just a shadow you&#039;re seeing that he&#039;s chasing...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragged Clown &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speaker/Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-6795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragged Clown &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speaker/Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=592#comment-6795</guid>
		<description>[...] Pelosi uses WordPress! I wonder if she has an opinion on the tags vs categories controversy?    Tags: blog, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pelosi uses WordPress! I wonder if she has an opinion on the tags vs categories controversy?    Tags: blog, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=592#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>The edit box is fairly starkly white, but if that&#039;s my heaviest cross to bear today, I&#039;ll consider my choice to get out of bed this morning validated.

Anyway, implicit in your controlling / enable comment [ by virtue of the fact that this is the only reason you&#039;ve cited and have removed them ] is a sentiment that controlling is bad, at least in this context.

I&#039;d argue that when you have lots of information to navigate, control can be helpful.

That said, most schemes I&#039;ve seen for such control start off with lots of categories and sub-categories resulting from Careful Deliberation and the system quickly dies on the vine.  It&#039;s a lot of work to maintain, and offers modest incremental benefit over your flat tag regime.  

Presumably you don&#039;t mean to denigrate control in an absolute sense, but as the owner and the person who&#039;d be burdened with the tedium of classification, you see the cost/benefit from one perspective, while Fans Like Me see a modest incremental benefit as 100% goodness.

Not sure what you mean about just tags enabling, tho.  I inferred you mean that categories that they do in a way that categories don&#039;t.  They both enable people to find info, but you probably meant something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The edit box is fairly starkly white, but if that&#8217;s my heaviest cross to bear today, I&#8217;ll consider my choice to get out of bed this morning validated.</p>
<p>Anyway, implicit in your controlling / enable comment [ by virtue of the fact that this is the only reason you've cited and have removed them ] is a sentiment that controlling is bad, at least in this context.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue that when you have lots of information to navigate, control can be helpful.</p>
<p>That said, most schemes I&#8217;ve seen for such control start off with lots of categories and sub-categories resulting from Careful Deliberation and the system quickly dies on the vine.  It&#8217;s a lot of work to maintain, and offers modest incremental benefit over your flat tag regime.  </p>
<p>Presumably you don&#8217;t mean to denigrate control in an absolute sense, but as the owner and the person who&#8217;d be burdened with the tedium of classification, you see the cost/benefit from one perspective, while Fans Like Me see a modest incremental benefit as 100% goodness.</p>
<p>Not sure what you mean about just tags enabling, tho.  I inferred you mean that categories that they do in a way that categories don&#8217;t.  They both enable people to find info, but you probably meant something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=592#comment-6757</guid>
		<description>They are officially &lt;i&gt;categories&lt;/i&gt; but I had changed the title to &lt;i&gt;topics&lt;/i&gt;. Anyway. They are gone now.

Categories seem more controlling. Tags enable.

[does this edit box seem too white to you?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are officially <i>categories</i> but I had changed the title to <i>topics</i>. Anyway. They are gone now.</p>
<p>Categories seem more controlling. Tags enable.</p>
<p>[does this edit box seem too white to you?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.raggedclown.com/2008/04/05/posts-and-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=592#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>Do you mean topics?

Can an item have multiple tags? categories? topics?  Do you ever plan to nest them into hierarchies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean topics?</p>
<p>Can an item have multiple tags? categories? topics?  Do you ever plan to nest them into hierarchies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

