Comments on: What could be worse than a rottweiller? http://www.raggedclown.com/2007/04/25/303/ It's just a shadow you're seeing that he's chasing... Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:43:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Kevin http://www.raggedclown.com/2007/04/25/303/#comment-1567 Kevin Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:27:01 +0000 http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=303#comment-1567 I think he is suggesting that they (Shakespeare and Tolstoy and Schiller and Dostoyevsky and George Eliot) provide better ways to understand ethical dilemmas precisely because they are not holy. I think he is suggesting that they (Shakespeare and Tolstoy and Schiller and Dostoyevsky and George Eliot) provide better ways to understand ethical dilemmas precisely because they are not holy.

]]> By: Rob http://www.raggedclown.com/2007/04/25/303/#comment-1566 Rob Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:19:49 +0000 http://www.raggedclown.com/?p=303#comment-1566 This is an interesting juxtaposition: "and [we] find that the serious ethical dilemmas are better handled by Shakespeare and Tolstoy and Schiller and Dostoyevsky and George Eliot than in the mythical morality tales of the holy books." It sounds like he's replaced on set of holy books with another. The rest of it is an interesting explanation of his [their? your?] non-belief. This is an interesting juxtaposition:

“and [we] find that the serious ethical dilemmas are better handled by Shakespeare and Tolstoy and Schiller and Dostoyevsky and George Eliot than in the mythical morality tales of the holy books.”

It sounds like he’s replaced on set of holy books with another. The rest of it is an interesting explanation of his [their? your?] non-belief.

]]>